A Comparative Review of Traditional vs. Structured Teaching Approaches on Infection Control Among NICU Nurses

Abstract

Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) infections are a major concern, requiring strict adherence to infection control protocols. While traditional training methods have been used to educate nurses, structured teaching programmes (STPs) offer a more systematic and interactive approach. This review compares the effectiveness of traditional vs. structured teaching in improving infection control practices among NICU nurses.

Objective: To analyze the impact of STPs compared to traditional training methods in enhancing nurses' infection control knowledge, behavior, and patient outcomes.

Methods: A literature review was conducted using databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL. Studies assessing infection control training methods were reviewed, with emphasis on knowledge retention, compliance rates, and neonatal infection reduction.

Results: Evidence suggests that while traditional training methods provide foundational knowledge, they often lack practical reinforcement, leading to lower compliance rates over time. In contrast, STPs incorporating interactive learning (e.g., role-playing, simulation exercises) significantly enhance nurses' ability to adhere to infection control guidelines. Hospitals implementing STPs observed notable reductions in neonatal sepsis and hospital-acquired infections (HAIs). Challenges such as resource allocation and institutional resistance were also identified.

Conclusion: Structured teaching programmes are more effective than traditional methods in improving infection control practices among NICU nurses. Healthcare institutions should consider integrating STPs into mandatory nurse training programs. Future research should explore long-term impacts and cost-effectiveness.